Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
branchandroot: Shio, character for salt (salt)
Annotating HP Philosopher's Stone, I think I've put my finger on one of the major points I have long felt make Rowling a bad writer. (Often charming, sometimes engaging, but still bad.) She makes a lot of use of exaggeration, which is a perfectly useful approach, and one often employed in children's lit. Unfortunately, she only uses it about half the time. Having Harry completely unaffected by what would, realistically, be vicious abuse from the Dursleys, and then turning around and having Draco and Ron play out class conflict absolutely straight, to take only two examples, just confuses the narrative. When using that kind of style, one needs to either exaggerate with sideways touches of realism, as in Roald Dahl, or else use realism with sideways touches of exaggeration, as in Dickens. Splitting it half and half doesn't work.

It doesn't help that she also deliberately opens up the question of moral ambiguity and mistaken perceptions by presenting Snape, who is very nasty to Harry and clearly dislikes him immensely and incidentally looks unappetizing, yet is still a good guy (thus breaking the otherwise thick streak of "your looks equal your character" in the book)... she presents this, as I say, but only for that one character. Everyone else is equally beaten with the black-and-white allegory bat of Harry's moral perception, but the implications that likable people are good and unpleasant people are bad are let to stand. In light of this, it once more fails to surprise me that so many fans went to such lengths to explore the space Rowling opened by implication but never carried through on, to recuperate Draco or show Dumbledore's darkness.

In a nutshell, Rowling is desperately inconsistent, and anyone who wants to engage with her books on more than a surface level is going to have to do all the world-building work themselves. She left it, not just unfinished, but barely started.

(But I am not, not, not going to be drawn back to working on "The Bells of Rhymney", despite the fact that the whole issue of house elves [see brownies] and enslavement and Hermione really does want attention. Not.)
branchandroot: Ed upside down (Ed upside down)
Just tripped over a particularly clear moment of idiocy on Wikipedia, pointing to a Rowling chat transcript. It's about Gryffindor's sword, and the goblins.

Now, I recall fairly clearly that there was, shall we say, cultural conflict at work in that case. A goblin work was handed to someone for money. In human understanding it was sold. In goblin understanding it was leased.

(See, we even have human ideas for the difference.)

So later on, when Gryffindor died and the sword was not returned, the goblins came all over pissed, because that, by their lights, was theft.

The wiki entry says "Gryffindor did not steal the sword from Ragnuk and that this belief is merely part of Griphook's goblin mistrust and prejudice against wizards." Rowling herself said "Griphook was wrong - Gryffindor did not 'steal' the sword, not unless you are a goblin fanatic and believe that all goblin-made objects really belong to the maker."

Which tells me that the writer herself could not wrap her brain around the idea that by goblin laws the goblins were right, and that, while the humans were right by their own laws, those laws were not the only ones involved in this case and not the only standard by which it should be judged. This despite having written the situation herself.

That, right there. That's how she could write the house elves the way she did and not think it was problematic.
branchandroot: oak against sky (Default)
Personal HP worldbuilding which may or may not go toward fic. This is mostly just reading some of [livejournal.com profile] copperbadge's fic and frustration talking.

Becuse, good grief Rowling, could you be sketchier or more illogical if you tried with both hands?

Known: Hogwarts is the only secondary school for wizards in the country.

Known: Rowling says there is no University for wizards in Britain.

Personally known: It is not feasible for such things as research or skilled professions like the medical profession to go on without more intensive education in specific fields than is shown at Hogwarts.

Extrapolation: The population of wizards in comparison to non-wizards must be very small if the entire secondary-schooled population fits in one castle with a mere score of teachers. The population of those who wish to go on to careers requiring tertiary education may, then, be too small to support a university that has sufficient diversity and resources to serve them all. Nevertheless, they must be trained, lest they all kill themselves and each other.

Possibility One: Tertiary education is on the apprenticeship model. Each profession has its own training system and takes care of its own fledglings. Auror's Academy and medical internships, that sort of thing.

Possibility Two: Wizards who require further education in experimental and research procedure share facilities with one or more non-wizard universities, simply 'borrowing' rooms, buildings, libraries and the like, modifying or hiding them as required.

Corollary for Two: Passing the NEWT in Muggle Studies is absolutely required of wizards going on to tertiary studies in such fields.

Possibility Three: British wizards must go abroad to universities that are on the continent in order to get tertiary education.


Conclusion: If Rowling wanted to roll back time in the wizard culture a few hundred years, then she should never have also included institutions such as a ministry offices dedicated to research or a medical profession that appears effective enough to require advanced education and certification.

In addition, the lack of centers for advanced learning implies a certain lack of emphasis or value, in the wizard culture, placed on the study of things that are not immediately useful to a specific vocation. Such study is precisely where a good many advances in understanding the workings of the world around us come from. Particle physics, for example, is not often immediately useful, but discoveries in that field have the potential to eventually accomplish things that are purely imagination right now, and so people study it. Wizard culture does not appear to value that kind of forward drive, witness the antiquated educational system under discussion and their astonishing ignorance of the far larger non-magic culture in which they are lodged.

From which I further conclude that Rowling's wizards actually have good cause to fear discovery by non-wizards, because, magic or no, at this point the Muggles would roll them all up in a few months, if there ever appeared to be a reason to do so. Vandalism, attacks and wanton interference with people's minds would probably provide that reason, should it ever come to light for the population at large.
branchandroot: oak against sky (Default)
So, here's what I don't like about that epilogue.

Spoilers, obviously )

And that is why I don't believe in this epilogue, any more than I believe in the Digimon Adventure 02 epilogue.

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 11:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios