characters, muses, stuff
Mar. 9th, 2004 01:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A recent post made me think.
Do my characters really *talk* to me? Do I hold actual conversations with them?
I mean, when I write it out in here, that's what it looks like. But in a lot of ways it feels like I'm translating what actually happens, which isn't verbalization at all.
On the other hand, there were a few times while writing "Glow" when I started to write some action, usually for Ed, and got a very definite veto. If I translate it into words it goes something like
Ed: Excuse me? I am not letting him carry me, what the hell are you thinking!?
It doesn't happen in words, though. That's just what I translate it to when I want other people to be able to hear it.
It's a lot more like echolocation, that process of asking myself questions until I get a solid "bounce", a firm contact, a "yes, that's it". Feelings, not words.
Only, it isn't asking myself, for this.
Storyspace, where all these characters stay, is an odd one. It's not part of my self, for all that it's inside my head. It's a shared space. I make it *out of* my self, and then use it to store copies of characters I like, which are, in effect, other people. Other people with whom I can utilize the protocals for internal communication. It makes the process of writing... curious. The plot comes out of my head, and then I bounce it off the shape of the characters and listen for how they react. And translate their reaction into dialogue. But to make that bounce work, I have to take the characters a little out of Storyspace, a little into my self. That's what gives me the channel of communication that carries the "yes I would do that/no I wouldn't do that" response. There has to be a constant feedback between my awareness of the plot and my awareness of the shapes of the characters, so I can hear when there's a break in congruity. A bad note.
I think maybe this is why I write so fast, when I write the stories down. Nonverbal communication, the internal kind, is extremely fast. I need to translate fast to keep up with it.
So I guess I'd have to say my characters don't really *talk* to me. But communication certainly happens when I rummage around in Storyspace.
Do my characters really *talk* to me? Do I hold actual conversations with them?
I mean, when I write it out in here, that's what it looks like. But in a lot of ways it feels like I'm translating what actually happens, which isn't verbalization at all.
On the other hand, there were a few times while writing "Glow" when I started to write some action, usually for Ed, and got a very definite veto. If I translate it into words it goes something like
Ed: Excuse me? I am not letting him carry me, what the hell are you thinking!?
It doesn't happen in words, though. That's just what I translate it to when I want other people to be able to hear it.
It's a lot more like echolocation, that process of asking myself questions until I get a solid "bounce", a firm contact, a "yes, that's it". Feelings, not words.
Only, it isn't asking myself, for this.
Storyspace, where all these characters stay, is an odd one. It's not part of my self, for all that it's inside my head. It's a shared space. I make it *out of* my self, and then use it to store copies of characters I like, which are, in effect, other people. Other people with whom I can utilize the protocals for internal communication. It makes the process of writing... curious. The plot comes out of my head, and then I bounce it off the shape of the characters and listen for how they react. And translate their reaction into dialogue. But to make that bounce work, I have to take the characters a little out of Storyspace, a little into my self. That's what gives me the channel of communication that carries the "yes I would do that/no I wouldn't do that" response. There has to be a constant feedback between my awareness of the plot and my awareness of the shapes of the characters, so I can hear when there's a break in congruity. A bad note.
I think maybe this is why I write so fast, when I write the stories down. Nonverbal communication, the internal kind, is extremely fast. I need to translate fast to keep up with it.
So I guess I'd have to say my characters don't really *talk* to me. But communication certainly happens when I rummage around in Storyspace.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 10:37 am (UTC)I've been worried that, when writing (fanfic or my original stories), I'm more of a puppeteer than a reporter (and I used to be much more of a reporter, for various reasons), and I worry that I'm not being 'true' to the characters. Because even in fiction, a lot of it is about truth, still. (Perhaps moreso than in nonfiction, maybe, because the truth you're relaying is so ... ephemeral, for lack of a better word.) But even then you have to ask yourself 'who' these characters are and 'where' they come from...
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:19 am (UTC)But it is interesting when you stop and think about how people go about writing, what inspires them, keeps them going and who talks to them in their heads.
Those things alone could have an entire library written about them...
...
And I probably made no sense but yeah I need my coffee.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:27 am (UTC)I think writers just listen better than most. Like Alice Walker signing off The Color Purple as "author and medium".
Of course, I also think the whole soulbond thing is an excuse, an externalization so the author in question doesn't have to deal with the aspects that *are* self. But that's a personal prejudice.
*thoughtful* You know, I think I envision characters as something very like language itself. They are shared symbols, shared between many people, meaning loosely the same thing, but never *entirely* the same thing. So that where they come from is partially me and partially other people. The truth... will never rest with any one of us.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:36 am (UTC)I stubbed my toe on one of those just day before yesterday.
*thinks* There certainly could be libraries about it, but I don't think there are. I've actually found very few authors who can write about how they write, or at least few who have published it. LeGuin. Walker. Bujold a little. At least those are the ones I found writing about it seriously. I've seen collections of very shallow "how I write" essays by authors, but those are generally pap.
Coffee is good--imbibe the stuff of life. *nods*
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:41 am (UTC)I do find that it helps if I translate it up into words. When I'm stuck I've been journalling my discussions with the characters, and the translation process itself seems to jar things loose again.
And if I'm writing it out, then I have a record, unlike when I'm talking it out aloud, and usually forget what I just said as soon as I reach the conclusion. *makes face*
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 12:38 pm (UTC)*glances nervously at older wips* Not sure what's going to happen when I go back to them.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:08 pm (UTC)Anyway...I had a point.
*thinks*
Characters have never talked to me. The story does, though; at the same time, the story is never really plot-driven. It's more of a "drop the character in this environment, and see what happens" - so I'm rarely at a loss as to what will happen next, unless I'm unable to get inside a character's head.
Thing is, I've never had the problem of being too inside a character's head, which is a good thing, considering some of the content I've tackled, and plan to tackle. I'm currently 28 chapters into a story that addresses the healing process for a victim of torture (in essence), and I have yet to write a chapter that didn't make at least four or five reviewers cry - if not more. Each time, I'm a little startled by their response, especially when it's one or two lines that prompted such a reaction. I didn't see it, although I will feel the twist in my gut reading someone else's story, I don't when it's my own. Hell, my own lemons don't do jack for me. I'm...detached, somehow. Not the right word. It's kind of like asking the keyboard how it feels about what's on the screen, I suppose. I only know, these words belong here, and these words do not. I change accordingly, but I can't guage the emotional reaction.
I've only had one character pushing to get out, and she was a joy to write, but that was mostly because there was a story that came with her. I think what I feel most often isn't related to characters, but stories. Sometimes I feel desperate, driven, and I lie in bed thinking, I should get up and write. The story is bugging me - GET IT OUT! Like I'm running out of time, if that makes sense. This would explain how, in the past six or seven months, I've produced a chapter roughly every day and a half...like I'm not even in control. Gadz, I probably sound like an addict, but it's an addict in reverse - instead of using the drug, I'm producing it.
I think maybe this is why I write so fast, when I write the stories down. Nonverbal communication, the internal kind, is extremely fast. I need to translate fast to keep up with it.
Yah. I think that's part of it. I tend to type fast, but it's a desperate kind of speed - like I'm screaming to the story to WAIT UP, I'm typing as fast as I can! Almost like taking down notes while life is going on around you, and when you're tracking that nonverbal, it does move faster than words. Lightening-fast. I suppose there are conversations going inside my head, balancing this line against that, these words against that, this plot twist against that, but because of the speed, I don't see it. Seamless? Opaque, perhaps. Odd, that it would be opaque to me.
What's strange is that when I slow down - as I have, at points, out of a sense that I should - I always trip. The metaphors are too clunky, the characterization too flat. When I speed up, I get these reviews back that laud the metaphor, the subtle use of this or reference to that, and I can only think: the what? Hunh? Are you reading the same story I wrote? Now I understand Tolkein's comment that if you want to read Gandalf the White appearing on the Plain as some sort of avenging angel, you can, but that's not what was in his head when writing - he was busying thinking, move this character here, and then this will happen...Yah, now I understand. The story just takes care of itself, if you can keep up.
*wrings fingers*
Sometimes I can't keep up, and I feel like I'll go mad.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:14 pm (UTC)Heh.
Right now I'm just stalling on a challenge one-shot, however. ;D
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:33 pm (UTC)Each time, I'm a little startled by their response, especially when it's one or two lines that prompted such a reaction. I didn't see it, although I will feel the twist in my gut reading someone else's story, I don't when it's my own.
I find that this is most often true for me when I'm writing something that *should be* extremely intense. Or affecting. Or something. I was absolutely floored when Em said "Morning" made her cry, even though I can see now that I probably would have had the same reaction if it was someone else's story. Lilias, for example, made me cry my eyes out.
Some day, when I feel particularly stable to start with, I'll read Broken Jade and tell you what I think.
but that's not what was in his head when writing
Ah, reader response, where would we be without it?
...with a lot fewer flame wars, actually. ^_^;
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:40 pm (UTC)Emily: I'm having trouble with this transition.
Ken: What kind?
Emily: Well, why would he do X? Is it Y? Or is it Z? Or... *holds up finger and stares into space*
Emily: ....
Emily: *dashes for computer*
Ken: *calls after with a grin* Glad I could help.
So I really do think it's the process of translating what I hear into words that gives me words I can put down on the page/screen. I'm not usually looking for feedback so much as an ear while I fish.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 02:17 pm (UTC)Yes. Echolocation. It's JUST like that. This is why I don't write fanfic. I get unbelieveably uptight about the translating part. My goal is to make the writing invisible, so I cut out any of my own narration. Every single word has to be tested for my own feeling and oh. My. God. It kills me.
With drawing, I almost don't have to echolocate at all. I just do it some at the beginning, and then I get a fairly stable mental picture of what's happening. I already know how I want the eyes or that coat or this arm to look, so it's just a matter of making it match on both sides. I still have (sometimes outrageous) criteria for what I want, but no worries about putting in too much of my own feeling because I have to be clearly OUTSIDE whatever I'm drawing to see it.
Wow. It reminds me that I do enjoy drawing. ^^ Feels goooood.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 02:45 pm (UTC)So do the stories that go with your pictures come out of the beginning? Or do you fill that in at the end? Because you always have a story that goes with; that was how the Summer arc happened, after all.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 03:27 pm (UTC)I think there are a lot of writers who seem to "tap into" their characters - a scribe rather than a puppet master. Perhaps that's what may be going on. The story is being told, inside your head, and you're transcribing something that has all ready been created in your mind. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 05:50 pm (UTC)...
Getting back to the subject, most of those papers in the mess have things on them, but they're even more incomplete than what I usually put up. I have my fingers in too many pies at once---I need to focus on one thing that doesn't kill me and just put it up already.
...but there are SO MANY things that need my attention T_T
I WAS thinking about the stories that go with. I usually get flashes of the picture in my head first---I just watch as the image bumps into me as it goes by, but I don't say anything back, so that's pretty fast. Then I go and put it in the context of the characters and check everybody's reactions. If there are any reactions that fit with my image, that I can draw, I pick out the ones I like, and start drawing those.
The thing is that I usually continue to check/get reactions while I draw, because it's fun, but I don't use them in the picture---in fact, I cut off adding the new ideas to the picture very early on. It's kind of dangerous for me to let other images get into one picture. If I don't focus on one at a time, I start trying to draw two pictures at once, and jesus CHRIST does that make a mess. So instead, I file away what I get into the "not now" category, and then later on I sort it out a bit and it turns into those blurbs I love to write.
(And then if I get lucky, I distract swanky fanfic authors and they write things for me. XB)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-10 09:19 am (UTC)I think it depends on the reader - the other War Room folks adore it, but then, they frequently kill, maim, traumatize, and just plain brutalize the G-boys on a regular basis. Ah, it's a bit of a joke between us: how much can you do, and still be IC?
And it's not unremitting gloom - as a matter of fact, many of the first ten or so chapters aren't nearly as bad as people expected, because of the way I structured things. But I won't say more than that...
- Sol
who needs cookies