Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
branchandroot: stack of books by arm chair (book love)
[personal profile] branchandroot
So, academic publishing in the humanities. [personal profile] melannen's post reminded me tangentially of everything that most pisses me off about it, and since I'm already grumpy over other things, I shall proceed to rant.

1) There's no money to the actual producers. Not a red cent. You're lucky if you get so much as a complimentary copy of the issue your article appears in. One thing you can be dead sure of is that you will never, ever receive cash compensation for any article, and damn few books. You don't get paid to do peer review, you're expected to put in hours of extra work for free all for the sake of having a "professional credit" to stuff into your CV (eg "I was stupid enough to love a field where half my labor is uncompensated"). Half the time even the journal editors don't get paid. Typesetting and so on is increasingly outsourced to underdeveloped areas where minimum wage is only a dream, which brings us to the next point.

2) The for-profit companies (Gale, Springer, etc.) who have been buying up the journals for decades are making money. They are making money by cutting production costs even further while increasing the subscription prices and selling individual articles for five to ten bucks apiece through online outlets like Amazon. See above re the author never seeing a cent of this. And even the university libraries are becoming unable to pay subscriptions.

3) The writers, as a matter of course, sign over every single right we have to the work. The publisher can re-publish or sell it anywhere they like, hell they could probably make it into a movie, but if I want to republish my own damn article in a new anthology I have to get Gale's permission. If I want to use my own article in my own class, I have to get Gale's permission and quite possibly pay a "nominal" license fee; you know, for that article I was never paid anything for.

When the publishers in question were purely academic concerns, subsidized by crumbs of their university's budget, all this free labor made more sense. It was for love and discovery and bragging rights; it had a whole lot in common with fandom, actually. But once the for-profit companies came into it the whole thing turned into bare-faced exploitation, and I swear half the academy can't even see it. Possibly because they don't listen to the librarians, who have seen the prices going up and the access going down first hand. Among the half who can see it, there is still a sad degree of resistance to moving over to open-access web-journals, and thereby back to our previous position of crumb-subsidized labor of love that, extra bonus, anyone who wanted could read, thus getting us and our work out from under the control of Gale et al.

It just frosts my cookies, you know?

Date: 2010-02-25 10:19 am (UTC)
forthwritten: (british museum)
From: [personal profile] forthwritten
It's a horrible situation. And you're forced into this system as a junior academic - you've got to have publications in prestigious journals to get ahead, and open-access web-journals often don't have that prestige. Having looked at subscription rates - individual articles in the main journal for my field can be up to $40 - it makes me furious that I'm expected to produce content when I can't even afford to purchase that content.

Date: 2010-02-25 06:04 pm (UTC)
mitsuhachi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mitsuhachi
That is completely ridiculous. Surely something could be done? Presentations to boards? Or some prestigious school doing an open access journal? Something? Because that is completely exploitation on every level, and stifling academic discourse to boot.

Date: 2010-02-25 06:20 pm (UTC)
mitsuhachi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mitsuhachi
Well, they're still peer-reviewed, right? Still require certain qualifications for authors? Still, you know, exactly like now except without corporations making money off of screwing academics from both sides?

>.< That is extremely frustrating.

Date: 2010-02-25 08:08 pm (UTC)
mitsuhachi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mitsuhachi
Because that would mean there'd be more articles on the market, and theirs would be less valuable!

...wait.

-_-;

Date: 2010-02-26 12:46 am (UTC)
viklikesfic: avatar me w/ trans flag, spiky hair, gender unclear, fun punky glasses & sarcastic expression to go w/purple ironic halo (Default)
From: [personal profile] viklikesfic
Too effin' true.

I'm being published in an upcoming academic book, and as I edit my contribution there are some things I want to add, but I'm severely limited by the fact that I no longer have access to a university library. I'm passionate about academics, and did consider going into it as a career at one point, but ended up deciding against it. It's frustrating that the world of academic writing (and research) is pretty much closed to me.

On a positive note, I really like the philosophy of people like "The Tolkien Professor," who does lots of free in-depth audio lectures because he hates the inaccesibility of academic literature. Add to that list MIT's open courseware and the new iTunes University. I hope that something like these free lectures and course material will soon start to pop up in the form of actual free access to academic papers, but I won't hold my breath.

Date: 2010-03-04 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] dragonwolf
That makes me glad I've decided against paying for academic articles for research purposes. If I'm going to pay someone for an article, I'd rather the money go to the people actually doing the work, not the bastards who think they should be entitled to large sums of money for the "service" of making the articles accessible to those willing to pay the stupid amount of money.

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Style Credit

Page generated Aug. 19th, 2025 02:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios