The only thing I really have to say about AO3's latest contretemps is:
I told you so~When a platform is so fucked up that the only way to make it run is to take out the navigation, then it's time to think real hard about who's been driving development.
no subject
Tags and tag wrangling themselves are unaffected. Meaning - if you click on a tag - everything connected to that tag will pull up.
Advanced search, however, doesn't work that way - if you search for 'Coulson' in the tag search, you'll only get works tagged with 'Coulson', but if you then click on 'Coulson', you'll get works tagged as all the variations attached to 'Coulson'. (Unless something's changed dramatically that I've not been told about.)
So it's not the 'tags' themselves causing the issue, it's the db walking through each of the works that pulls up in the 1000 results to populate the filter w/ the top-level/canonical tags. Which, if it's one or two people, not a problem, but when it becomes waaaaaay more than that - yeah, problem.
How to fix that? *shrug* Again - I am not a dba of any fashion. I wouldn't even know where to start.
I do know that there are plans to update the filtering system. I don't know what they are or what the ETA is - though it's possibly going to get bumped up considerably given the recent evidence, but that's not my domain.
As far as invites - I'm with ya'll there - just send 'em out and let people in. Though, I don't think an invite is needed just to read on the archive - only if one wants to comment or bookmark w/in the archive.
no subject
*puts her head down and just cries*
Oh my /god/, who thought that was a good idea?! How did the fact that the query had to be capped not suggest instantly that the basic concept was flawed, and it would only get worse?
How they fix it is to only put the canonical character and relationship tags associated with a given fandom source in that sidebar. Those to be retrieved with a /single/ query to a new table which uses the fandom source id as the primary key to associate canonicals with the source(s). Faceted filtering by freeform needs to wait until they have got a competent project manager and admin, and probably be a totally separate page in the Tags area.
Oh my unholy fuck. I think I need to go get my smelling salts. No wonder it was such a hideous drain.
no subject
no subject
no subject
That graphic. That graphic is what is getting me. They put out there in visual form for all to see how flamingly goddamn incompetent they are.
And they probably think that's a good thing because it's totally a sign that they're Improving Communication and Working On The Problems.
(No, what would be improving communication and working on the problems would be recognising that you have profound and fundamental design problems and at minimum hire (yes, HIRE, as in pay them an appropriate professional fee) a consultant to help you go through the code and identify the problems. And then telling us you're doing that, and why. Or hey,
no subject
no subject
To date, he's been brushed off as far as I am aware, and since he's not personally invested in the platform sufficient to fight to be able to assist them, it hasn't gone anywhere. Perhaps the word in the right ears, though! I hope something comes of it. :)
no subject
Even if they are caching the works listing, they can't be caching the sidebar if they're doing it like that. There's -- I think I need some damn smelling salts myself, now.
No wonder it's two-thirds of their load, god.
no subject
no subject
Because that would be an absolutely bizarre act of lunacy, sure, but that would be a case of what else is new hey guys the sky is blue and AO3 handles tags bizarrely.'
But... no.
I am all the fuck out of can. Also, even. I am straight up out of even. I CANNOT EVEN, BRANCH. I ACTUALLY CANNOT EVEN.
no subject
no subject
*does not code for anything, does a LOT of guessing based on logic*
Personally, I love the *idea* of the filters, but I do agree they are clunky as hell. (I'm assuming others felt the same, hence the redesign that is in progress.)
no subject