branchandroot: Ginji and Akabane with a heart (Ginji Akabane Heart)
Branch ([personal profile] branchandroot) wrote2010-01-05 05:57 pm
Entry tags:

The difference between manga and comics

Actually, this is a lot broader than that, but that was one of the places this post started. The other was Rana's comment on a different post, words to the effect that the fan-cultures in question seem to divide themselves based only on some very fuzzy Orientalism.

I agree that fuzzy Orientalism is the most regrettably common way Western fans of similar media from different national/ethnic groups (eg comics and manga) express their differentiation. That particular expression is generally a lot of hot air, yes.

But I also think there are real fan-culture differences, touching on though not always rising directly from the mother-culture differences of the sources. This is my attempt to articulate the ones that I've seen. Warning: generalizations ahead, though not baseless ones.

ETA: To elaborate, this post is based on my own and my circle's experiences in various fandoms; unfortunately I managed to phrase things rather more generally and universally than I quite realized at the time. *rueful* None of the following is actually meant to be a Declaration Of How Fandom Is Everywhere. That said, the experience in question is not a narrow one, and I think the following is representative of a significant section of manga (and anime) fandom participants.


One major fan-culture difference is Japanophilia. Not the study of another culture, though it can in a few happy cases evolve into that, but the fad for and valorization of the surface and trappings of another culture. It makes me twitch, but there it is. However much some of us headdesk, this exoticization isn't going away anytime soon and it is a significant fan-culture difference.

Another is what we might call the discussion tropes of the fandoms. These tend to evolve from a handful of defining features in the sources where they cross with the developing tenor of the fandom culture. A recurring discussion in comic fandoms, for example, revolves around the hypersexualization of women, and how objectionable it is to reduce all the women to a set of tits and an ass. Manga fandoms do not have this discussion (ETA: I should have phrased this as something more like "this discussion or similar ones regarding the rendering of women as two-dimensional objects who exist for the benefit of men and not as fully realized characters"), not as a Known Issue, not in the open, despite an at least equal tendency to appalling objectification in the source material. Instead, the discussion usually gets pushed into private mode before it really gets going. See above, re: Japanophilia and valorization, also re: headdesking. On the other hand, the original language itself is a discussion point largely peculiar to Western manga fandoms, as will generally be the case with a translated source. It expresses as everything from language lessons to fights over transliteration systems to the eternal localization vs. "direct" translation battle, and knowledge of those debates acts as one of the shibboleths of manga fandoms.

Then there's actual style and content in the source. There has always been a certain give and take, between this particular two-set, of artistic style, and as US comics (the only ones I can speak to from experience) diversify it's becoming more evident, but there are also story tropes that are still distinct. How else, when they arise from two separate mother-cultures? To name only one, multiple genres of manga have, for decades, toyed with explicit homoeroticism in a way that comics in general do not. The genre diversity itself is another example, and the variety of story-types told in manga format. The symbolic language is, and can only remain, distinct as well. Curiously enough, such story tropes do not result in many fan-culture differences that I have seen, except insofar as manga fandom can, for example, show a more intense defensiveness, sometimes devolving into outright gay-bashing, over reading and enjoying explicit gay (only not real gay, which is a whole nother essay) romance, porn and slapstick. (ETA: I did not phrase myself with enough specificity here; I am aware of the voluble gay-bashing in comics fandoms. What I refer to is the particular "screw for my enjoyment while I deny you the right to live" double-mindedness that shows up among fen who are trying to have their cake and bash it too. The key word, here, is defensiveness.) The different story tropes I would put down as a distinction between the sources, but not one that manifests much in fandom culture outside of the actual preference for the style and content of one group of sources or another.


Now, what I would be interested to know is: do the same kinds of differences show up in the Western fandoms of Western and Asian TV? Or of Western bands and Asian bands? And do they manifest in gaming fandoms? That last especially interests me, since the game sources seem to be the most self-aware of the trans-Pacific trade.

ETA: As per suggestion, I would like to point out that I have not been present for the bulk of wrangler discussions on associated issues. These are thoughts going off in a different (somewhat) direction, so please to be not be bringing other fights in here. I am an unaligned polity.

ETA some more: Will not be replying to further comments on this one because work has descended for the term. Talk among yourselves if you like.
elspethdixon: (Default)

[personal profile] elspethdixon 2010-01-06 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
There has always been a certain give and take, between this particular two-set, of artistic style, and as US comics (the only ones I can speak to from experience) diversify it's becoming more evident, but there are also story tropes that are still distinct.

I know there's been some anime influence on superhero comics art in recent years, and there's at least one manga artist/writer I can think of whose character designs are occasionally homages to various X-Men characters (I forget his name, but he's the one who wrote/drew Ruroni Kenshin), but the visual storytelling techiniques are often very different, even accounting for the left-to-right vs. right-to-left issue. I had to learn an entirely different visual 'vocabulary' to read manga and doujinshi (then again, I also had to learn a new set of visual storytelling rules for Golden Age comics vs. modern ones).

Which says nothing about the fandoms involved, of course, and I think there is some degree of blending between the two -- most of the comicbook stores I've been in sell manga as well as the classic DCU/Marvel/Vertigo/Dark Horse stuff, for example, and I saw more than one set of Naruto or Final Fantasy or Dragonball cosplayers at NYCC last year. Not to mention that anime and Marvel/DC superhero comics both have international fanbases.

I'd feel weird lumping them all together under a generic "comics" tag on AO3, though, because the term "comics" is so strongly associated with American comicbooks that I feel like other artistic traditions would get erased or subsumed by it (a lot of people hear "comics fandom," and think superheroes -- even other Western comics like Asterix or Tintin or Calvin & Hobbes or Peanuts don't really come to mind).
troisroyaumes: Painting of a duck, with the hanzi for "summer" in the top left (Default)

[personal profile] troisroyaumes 2010-01-06 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Just stepping into say, I think if merging occurs, it would be under a more neutral term like "Sequential Art and Animation". At least, I haven't seen anyone propose to call the category "comics". (Am on the tag wrangling team.)
elspethdixon: (Default)

[personal profile] elspethdixon 2010-01-06 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
A "sequential art and animation" tag would cover the entire spectrum, yeah. *nods* Plus it would cover things like webcomics that are often their own seperate thing.
elspethdixon: (Default)

[personal profile] elspethdixon 2010-01-06 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I tend to think of Stan Lee Syndrome as Lots! Of Unecessary! Exclamation! Points! myself. That, and a particular kind of playful snark that a lot of silver age Marvel characters display (it often involves irreverent one-liners and giving people cutesy nicknames).

Whereas Frank Miller syndrome is whoreswhoreswhores self-consciously grim and noir-esque internal monologue in square text boxes.

I can't comment on layout, but there are a few comics artists from the late 90s onward who have some visible anime influence in their character design (every now and then, for example, I'll look at a comics panel and think "that's anime hair"). Tracing/photo references and some degree of photorealism seem to be in vogue at the moment, though. Sometime to good effect, as with Adi Granov's Iron Man art, and sometimes to very, very bad effect, as with Greg "I Trace From Porn! And Usually From the Same Three/Five Photographs!" Land.
elspethdixon: (Default)

[personal profile] elspethdixon 2010-01-06 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
But if you did a cartoon based on a Marvel or DC comic, which art style would you copy?

In some ways, the fact that comics titles tend to shuffle artists rather than having a distinctive visual style gives animators more leeway to do whatever they want. On the other hand, I'd kill to have an Avengers cartoon as visually gorgeous as Tsubasa or X. (Okay, I just want CLAMP to do an Avengers manga that's turned into an anime and gives the Wasp a different costume in every episode a la Card Captor Sakura).
azurite: (cupcake sombrero!)

[personal profile] azurite 2010-01-07 11:26 am (UTC)(link)
Jumping in to add yeah: you say "comics," my first thought isn't Calvin & Hobbes, but Superman or Batman and the like. But nowadays, if I go into a Borders, I can find DC/Marvel/Dark Horse/etc. all under "graphic novels" just a shelf away from all the Japanese and Korean manga/manhwa. Comics -which covers the Calvin & Hobbes, Dilbert, etc. are in their own, other section of the store. Not that Borders is the end-all, be-all Mode For Organization of Fan Media, but it was my first thought.

I remember when Tokyopop (née Mixx) was trying to define manga as "motionless picture entertainment," which is a lark. It basically translates to "comics." And the term "anime" is really just short for the French word for animation, which covers things like cartoons. And yet I feel like it's transcended the original, simplified meaning and to someone like me within fandom, anime is not "a cartoon," even though if you want to be literal about it, it is. But it "feels" different to me, the same way manga feels different than comics. I'm in fandoms of all those varieties, and I'm used to not seeing Superman lumped in with Sailor Moon or Popeye paired off with Puni Puni Poemi.